In what way it makes a difference if the seeker has
learnt to chant Vedas or not?
whatever little of Vedas or Upanishads
mandatory clause (of ashramas) anywhere else? Tell me.
re-interpret what I thought Raman indicated me on the
the garbha gruham glowed in beautiful splendour
in the light shed by the Thoonga ViLAkku (oil lamp)
deepaaraadhana near his thirumeni.
The immediate thought that flashed in my mind was
pleasant glow inside the garbha gruha where I was
able to see clearly the smile on the face of Ramanuja
glow in shantham, consolation (don’t worry
kuzhandhaai), karuNyam and an alAdhi prIthi.
that you would have somewhere indicated that. Bless me
to grasp it soon.”
telling on his own volition (?) that Ramanuja stood for free inquiry.
searching, discussing, debating and inferring the
salient aspects of Knowledge.
thakkapadi avaravar purindu koLgirArgaL.
he wanted everyone to do.”
said in his commentary to Brahma Sutras.
again and again.
indicated his reply.
be somewhere in Brahma sutras.
to identify them. Sutras 46, 47 & 48 in chapter 3-3
shed light on ‘mental fires’. He talks about the
glory of meditation (of mental nature) in the context
of sacrificial fires. The sacrificial fires are aimed
at certain fruits. Texts speak about different
ingredients that go into the conduction of sacrifices
of mental fires. “The altars made of mind may be
equivalent to the altar made of bricks in some
aspects. This similarity does not authorize us to
connect mind-made altars with the actual sacrifice.
The point is that the fruit of both the performances
He draws pramana from Satapatha Brahmana to establish
that the passages that speak about mental fires on
brick altars cannot be taken as literal sacrifice but
as meditation. To transfer this to reply our query,
“each one is as great as the previous one’ (sat
X-iv-1.3) meaning that each type of meditation, one by
way of ‘works’ as prescribed by karma khandam and the
other by way of knowledge are independent of each
other and as great as each other.
Further we find in sutras 3-4-14, 16 &19 it is
established that knowledge is not subsidiary to works.
“Permission to perform work is for the glorification
of knowledge. Indeed, one may work all his life, still
he is not tainted by the greatness of knowledge.
Therefore knowledge is not subsidiary to works.”
To present all this in a nutshell, Ramanuja says like
this in his commentary for verse 3-4-26.
“ Knowledge is something absolutely different from
the knowledge of the textual meaning. It is denoted by
words such as dhyana (meditation), upasana (worship)
etc. It is of the nature of remembrance, which has
attained the form of direct and clearest perception.
By practicing day by day, it attains excellence, and
being continued up to final departure, it becomes the
means of attaining final release.’
form of a succession of memories which is unbroken
like a stream of oil.” Elsewhere he regards this
stream of oil (thaila dhaaravathu) as bhakti. He
regards this non-stop remembrance as bhakti.
In simple parlance Ramanuja comes to regard bhakti as
the result of works and knowledge as the result of
inquiry into Brahman.
He talks about karma khandam and the scope of
sacrifices not with a purpose to glorify them. He
instead highlights the limits on the nature of fruits
given by those sacrifices.
The substituting term for this is bhakti.
In today’s condition, these ingredients of sacrifices
help one in growing in bhakti.
texts say, that knowledge can not gained.
Without bhakti, knowledge into the nature of Brahman
or god cannot be gained.
Texts say that vedic chanting (‘works’) is the
antecedent to knowledge.
Similarly, bhakti is antecedent to knowledge.
Without bhakti, knowledge cannot bloom.
But at the same time knowledge is not subsidiary to
Gyaana khnadam supported by karma khandam was the
path way to salvation. Similarly, knowledge in the
nature of Bhakti is the means of attaining the
Bhagavan (VS- 251)
Bhakti leads to knowledge just as how ‘works’ lead to
Knowledge without bhakti is wasteful just as how gyana
khnadam without karma khandam cannot give results.
Bhakti leading to knowledge is like how karma mimamsa
study leads to the study of gyana mimamsa.
Ramanuja has given the prescription. So grieve not, my
mind whether you have sanction to recite vedas. Any
such recital that leads you to bhakti-marga is
accepted. Without such recital you can not realise the
glory of Knowledge. Like without karma khanda, one can
not pursue utthara khanda. The recital though very
insignificant in today’s condition is aimed at
hastening your interest in gyana marga.
Bhoothathaazhwar had shown the way in lighting the
lamp of knowledge by ‘inburugu sindhai’. The urugum
inbam shows the preethi by name bhakti. The sindhai
stands for knowledge. So grieve not, my mind, grieve
To get sanction for this, I again went to see Kembal
Raman. With eyes closed with a viNNappam (request)
paasurams.’ (The last 10 verses in Periyaazwar Thirumozi –
ennaiyum vunnil ittEn’,
The bhattar was inserting a flower in Raman’s nenju (chest)
when I was saying ‘ennaiyum vunnil ittEn’.
It is what springs in our mind that He takes as our
It is the inner thought, inner glow, inner bhakti
that is the ultimate outcome of all this inquiry – no
matter whether it comes from a man or a woman.
Thank you Rama.
You are all the more concerned that you must get back
your Sita who is none other than us, the jivas.
You are the Creator who craves to get back His dear
ones - us.
You cannot bear the loss of your dear ones into the
vicious cycle of birth and death. You always think of
ways and means of getting us back to You.
So it wont make an issue whether I am a woman or not,
whether I chant Vedas or not. It is enough to know
that you are waiting for me!!